HEALTH
The
Congress is gagging on a barely palatable bolus of Health Care Bills that the
Administration wants it to disgorge sooner than seems possible. Meanwhile the
media and some in Congress extrude talking points about cost saving measures
aimed singularly at the Medical Profession. I believe that with proper
management of Primary Care the system could save 100 Billion dollars a year
perhaps more. That is astonishing MONEY considering that the Wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq reportedly cost about $200 Billion a year.
Below is a breakdown of costs structure
of Health Care for 2007. Surprisingly doctors are involved in only 21% of Total
Health Care expenses. (Privatize Health Care for 1 year and resolve the debt
crisis!)
|
|
HEALTH |
% |
|
Equals $ |
|
1 |
Total Cost 2007 |
100 |
*2.24*1012 |
2.24 Trillion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Physician Clinical Services |
21 |
=4.707*1011 |
470.7 Billion |
|
3 |
Hospital Care |
31 |
=6.944*1011 |
694.4 Billion |
|
|
Total |
52 |
=1.17*1012s |
1.17
Trillion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Investment |
6 |
=1.34*1011 |
134 Billion |
|
5 |
Government Public Health |
3 |
=0.67*1011 |
067 Billion |
|
6 |
Program Administration |
7 |
=1.57*1011 |
157 Billion |
|
7 |
Retail-other products |
3 |
=0.67*1011 |
067 Billion |
|
8 |
Retail-Rx Drugs |
10 |
=2.24*1011 |
224 Billion |
|
9 |
Home Health Care |
3 |
=0.67*1011 |
67 Billion |
|
10 |
Nursing Home Care |
6 |
=1.34*1011 |
134 Billion |
|
11 |
Other Professional Services |
10 |
=2.24*1011 |
224 Billion |
|
|
Total |
48 |
=1.07*1012 |
1.07 Trillion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRAND TOTAL |
|
=2.24* 1012 |
2.24 Trillion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
bill for Physician Clinical Services is 470.7 $Billion dollars. If each Primary Care Doctor (PCD) practiced
300 days (D) each year; if each PCD saw 20 Patients (P) a day; if each P paid
$20 (F) for a visit: the total bill for
Primary Care Services would be $42 Billion dollars a year.1 This represents about 10% of the total bill
for Doctor-in office Care) ($470 Billion).
If the remainder (over $400 Billion annually) is applied to specialty care,
how much of that might be due to a cascade of unnecessary referrals of patients
for matters that might be attended at much lower cost in the offices of active
Primary Care Specialists?
Over
more than half a century the role of the Primary Care Doctor has morphed from
General Practitioner to Family Doctor, to Primary Care doc and currently to
Gate-keeper---the turnstile that distributes patients helter-skelter to
specialists and testing agencies. The “Gatekeeper” role has failed
miserably. The progression of
patient-care has become more akin to a market place of “piece goods” rather
than a procession of guardianships.
If the role of Primary Care were
expanded as described in this and another web site the arithmetic suggests that
hundreds of billions of dollars could be saved annually.
For the
Medical aspects of Health Care to work properly and efficiently Patient Care
must be governed by the Primary Care Doctor.
1 PCD=Primary
Care Doctor: 350,000
D =Days work per year 300
PD =Patient Days (PCD*D) 350,000 x 300= (3*102*3.5*105)
= 1.105*1010 = 105 Million Practice Days
F =Fee per patient $ 20.
(350,000
PCD x 210 million days in office per annum x Fee of $20 for each patient =$42
Billion dollars a year)
THE OTHER
There is little if any emphasis on the 48% of items
peripheral to Medical/Hospital care. For example, something called INVESTMENT
costs $134 billion dollars but there is no breakdown. Was money lost or gained
on the investment. What was the money invested in?
Program administration cost $157
billion. Does that include either or both Medicare and HMO administration?
Veterans? Indian Health?
“Retail
“Other
Professional services” for $224 Billion is vague not itemized.
We can mostly guess what Hospital and Medical Care is
but included in the total of $2.24 Trillion dollars are $582 Billion (1/2
Trillion or 25%) of the ill defined distribution of money. Since this half a
trillion has been approved by the Congress one might hope that in paring costs
the Congress (as well as media) might take a closer look at this particular
cluster of Health Care expense!
It would seem reasonable to parse those expenditures
before the disseminating the outlandish suggestion that doctors will be
reimbursed by “outcome” rather than the amount of work they perform.
“Outcome”. How will that be defined and
who will govern the definition? Doctors
keep trying until optimum outcome has been achieved. That costs money.
Were we to the judge the entire Congress by “OUTCOME”
nobody would ever be re-elected.